Carved in Stone
And Last Comes XYZ
Cartesian Coordinates can be used to specify the position of any point in three-dimensional space by measuring its distances from three mutually perpendicular planes.
Aggregate operations, or anything else, for that matter, can be located on the earth in a number of ways. When selecting a method, it is important to use unique identifiers. Let’s look at two suburban communities and see how we can differentiate them.
Suburb #1 is called Anthem. Suburb #2 is called Anthem.
Suburb #1 was built by a nationally known developer. Suburb #2 was built by the same developer.
Suburb #1 is located about 15 miles north of a major U.S. metropolitan area. #2 – Ditto.
#1 is located off Exit 229 along the major north/south interstate that serves the area. # 2 – Ditto.
#1 gets much of its aggregate from a nearby river valley. #2 – Ditto.
About 80 percent of the aggregate used by the state in which #1 is located is sand and gravel; about 20 percent is crushed stone. #2 – Ditto.
The annual per capita consumption of aggregate in the state in which Suburb #1 is located is about 6.5 tons. #2 – Ditto.
These identifiers are not helping to distinguish these two suburbs. Fortunately, there are more precise techniques to describe locations. Some people, especially when using geographic information systems (GIS), use three Cartesian coordinates (X, Y, and Z) to specify locations on the earth’s surface, where X is the longitude, Y is the latitude, and Z is the altitude of the point. The coordinates for Suburb #1 are: X = -105° 2′ 30″; Y = 39° 59′ 47″; Z = 5,180 feet. The coordinates for Suburb #2 are: X = -112° 8′ 08″; Y = 33° 51′ 55″; Z = 1,860 feet.
The third Cartesian coordinate – Z – does not always refer to the altitude of the land surface. Sometimes, such as in mine planning software, Z refers to the height above or below the land surface. For example, the alluvial gravels of the river near suburb #2 occur as three distinct alluvial deposits. The upper deposit (Z = 0 to -15 feet) consists of an even mix of sand and gravel and generally meets specification for durability and abrasion resistance after processing.
The middle deposit (Z = -15 to -30 feet) is slightly more clayey with larger sized gravel and slightly more coarse sand than the overlying deposit. It is lower quality than the upper deposit, and waste factors increase by about 3 percent.
The bottom deposit (Z = -30 to about -45 feet) comprises the lowest deposits that can be extracted without extensive inter-burden removal. However, it generally does not make construction-grade aggregate, unless it is blended with other, higher-quality material.
If you are wondering where on earth I am talking about, Suburb #1 is Anthem at Broomfield, Colo., and Suburb #2 is Anthem at Phoenix, Ariz. I chose these two places to use as an example for very personal reasons. By the time you read this article, I will have retired from the U.S. Geological Survey, and my wife Pam, our dog Rosie, and I will have moved from #1 to #2, where we will live directly across the street from our daughter (and only child) Kimberly, son-in-law (more like son) Rob, and grandkids Donovan (age 8) and Delaney (age 7).
So I guess I could have employed texting shorthand and titled this article:
XYZ – Xit #229. Y? Catch some Zs.
Author’s note: The past 24 articles have taken you from A to Z. Now it is my turn to go to AZ.
Bill Langer is a geologist with the Mineral Resources Team of the U.S. Geological Survey and can be reached at 303-236-1249 or via e-mail at email@example.com.
From our partners
The new Sandvik Ranger surface drill rig offers renowned drilling efficiency with up to 20% lower fuel consumption
Known to many by their former name, Ranger, Sandvik’s DX series surface…
MORE FROM Articles
SUBSCRIBE & FOLLOW
- Worker airlifted to hospital after accident with rock crusher521 Views
- Cat rolls out its 6020B hydraulic shovel, matches 777G haul trucks372 Views
- Unexpected sand and gravel causes rollover accident340 Views
- Buffalo Crushed Stone cited for pollution170 Views
- Highway Trust Fund: A look at who’s in and who’s out in next Congress149 Views