Compliance with proper equipment guarding

AggMan Staff | Published on December 1, 2012

For daily news updates and web-exclusive news items, visit the “AggBeat Online” section of our website at www.aggman.com

 

The Mine Safety and Health Administration develops a guide to help producers abide by industry rules and protect against guarding-related violations.

 

By Tina Grady Barbaccia, News and Digital Editor
 

The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) rolled out a new compliance assistance resource on Oct. 4 to address one of the most commonly cited violations in the metal and non-metal mining industry: improperly guarded machinery.

Guarding Machinery at Metal & Non-metal Mines is a sequel to a compliance guide for guarding conveyor belts published in 2010. Guarding-related violations peaked at 10,877 that year and accounted for one of every seven violations cited, according to MSHA.

“I believe the actions we are taking at MSHA and by many in the industry are moving safety and health in in the right direction,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health Joseph A. Main in remarks to aggregates producers this summer.

Main says the purpose of the new guide, which is designed to improve mine safety, is threefold: to improve the mining industry’s understanding of good guarding principles; ensure the construction, installation, and maintenance of high-quality, effective guards; and improve compliance, inspection, and enforcement consistency.

Guarding-related citations and orders issued through the third quarter of fiscal year 2012 are down 39 percent from 2010 level.

 — Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)

According to Parts 56/57.14107 of 30 Code of Federal Regulations, moving machine parts must be guarded to protect individuals from contacting gears; sprockets; chains; drive, head, tail and take-up pulleys; flywheels; couplings; shafts; fan blades; and similar moving parts that can cause injury. Guards are not required when the exposed moving parts are at least 7 feet away from walking or working surfaces, according to MSHA.

Injuries related to equipment guarding typically occur because guards are missing or inadequately sized or positioned. They also may be due to miners handling or dropping heavy, unwieldy, and other poorly designed, constructed, or maintained guards, according to MSHA. The agency gives the example of lacerations or other injuries occurring because of a guard’s construction.

Source: Mine Safety and Health Administration

The new guide gives examples of good guarding practice and compliance information relating to all types of mining equipment, including drive and power transmission components; crushers and screens; rotating, packaging, and palletizing equipment; power tools; and auxiliary equipment.

The conveyor belt guarding guide was well received by the mining industry and has resulted in increased compliance and more consistent enforcement, MSHA says. Guarding-related citations and orders issued through the third quarter of fiscal year 2012 are down 39 percent from 2010 levels, according to MSHA. Both guides have the same format: a photo-illustrated PowerPoint presentation with detailed explanatory notes.

Equipment guarding standards are among the most frequently cited violations in metal/non-metal mines, Main says. The number of citations and orders issued for guarding violations dropped 26 percent from 2010 to 2011, according to MSHA. The percentage of citations and orders for guarding-related violations has decreased significantly between 2006 and 2011, with that trend continuing so far this year.

However, Main says that many issues remain and guard provision, placement, construction, and maintenance require regular attention.

“A recent review shows that overall compliance is improving at mines after receiving impact inspections,” Main said during his July address to aggregates producers. He noted that, since MSHA launched the program in September 2010, violations per inspection hour are down 13 percent after mines received an initial impact inspection; significant and substantial (S&S) violation rates are down 21 percent; 104(d) orders are down 43 percent; and the total lost-time injury rate is down 13 percent, according to MSHA.

“Unfortunately, there are still mines that haven’t gotten the message,” Main pointed out. “The egregious problems found during some of these impact inspections and the extreme measures MSHA had to take to find them — arriving off-shift and commandeering mine phones — validate the administration’s support of focused improvements to the Mine Act that will give MSHA the tools it needs to address chronic violators.”

 

Mandate data for MSHA ‘duplicative, overly burdensome’

 

The National Stone, Sand and Gravel Association (NSSGA) filed that a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rule mandating that publicly-traded companies submit data on Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) compliance and injuries is “duplicative” and “overly-burdensome.” The comments from NSSGA were filed on Aug. 29.

NSSGA says it submitted the comments to both the SEC and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in response to OMB’s request for input on ways to relieve paperwork burden.

Presidential Executive Order 13610, Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens, requires that federal agencies take continuing steps to reassess regulatory requirements and, where appropriate, streamline, improve, or eliminate those requirements.

The association says it believes that it is unnecessary to provide this information again after it has already been given to MSHA.

According to NSSGA, examples of items needed for the SEC reporting include the following:

• Significant and substantial violations under Section 104 of the Mine Act;

• Orders under Section 104 (b);

• Unwarrantable failure citations and orders under Section 104 (d);

• Flagrant violations under Section 110 (b) (2);

• Imminent danger orders under Section 107 (a);

• Dollar value of proposed MSHA assessments;

• Mining-related fatalities;

• Notices of pattern of violations or potential to have pattern of violations under Section 104 (e); and

• Pending legal cases before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.

“This duplicative reporting has done nothing to make operations any safer or more compliant,” notes the NSSGA. Instead, is has led to a squandering of company resources because the requested information is already kept at the MSHA website.

For a downloadable PDF of a presentation Joseph Main gave to several aggregates groups in July, go to http://www.msha.gov/Media/SPEECHES/2012/NNSGAJMain71312.pdf. For a slideshow put together by MSHA to help mine operators with guarding compliance issues, go to http://www. msha.gov/Accident_Prevention/GuardingMachineryMNMMines.pdf.

 

Q3 GDP: Economy Muddling Through 

The U.S. economy may be sluggish, but an Oct. 26 report from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reported 2-percent growth in real gross domestic product for the third quarter of 2012.

This means that U.S. economic growth is slow but not slowing, according to Kathy Bostjancic, director for macro- economic analysis, The Conference Board. Bostjancic says it is difficult for the domestic economy “to grow any more robustly, given the relatively soft pace of consumption and investment, weak sentiment among businesses, continued austerity for state and local government spending, weak exports, and the looming ‘fiscal cliff.’” (For the Aggregates Manager blog post regarding the ‘fiscal cliff,’ go to www.aggman.com/the-nation-is-hurling-itself-toward-a-fiscal-cliff-says-abc-chief-economist/.

Bostjancic notes that “negative headwinds from Europe and Asia” appear to be more persistent than previously thought. However, amidst the negativity, Bostjancic thinks housing is finally turning into a positive factor after a long decline.

Nevertheless, she adds, the United States remains poised to at least partially fall off the “fiscal cliff,” citing politicians as responsible for this. Bostjancic predicts that politicians are likely to let the payroll tax cut and extended unemployment benefits expire at the end of this year. “This should depress economic growth to below 2 percent in the first half of 2013,” she says. “Assuming the economy does not go off a deeper cliff, however, activity could resume to more than 2.5-percent growth in the second half of the year. For that to happen, wage growth would have to pick up and give some much-needed impetus for consumption.”

AggBeat to Go

To get daily news updates from AggBeat Online, scan this tag with your smart phone.

 

 

advertisement
comments powered by Disqus

SUBSCRIBE & FOLLOW

advertisement

TWITTER

FACEBOOK

BLOG

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement